Missouri Civil Discovery Rules and Procedures
Missouri Civil Discovery Rules and Procedures
Missouri civil discovery is governed primarily by the Missouri Supreme Court Rules, Division 55 (Civil Procedure). Understanding these rules is critical for effective case management, as Missouri has specific numerical limits, timing requirements, and procedural safeguards that differ materially from federal practice and other states.
Mandatory Initial Disclosures
Missouri does NOT require automatic initial disclosures in the manner mandated by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a). Instead, Missouri follows a traditional discovery model where parties request information as needed.
However, Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.01 requires that within 15 days after the defendant has been served or has appeared, the parties must confer and discuss:
This conference does not mandate automatic disclosure of documents, witnesses, or expert information. Rather, it establishes a framework for cooperative discovery planning. Parties may agree in writing to modify discovery rules or establish expedited schedules.
In cases involving more complex claims or multiple parties, Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.02 allows courts to order parties to file a "discovery plan" outlining the scope, timing, and methods of discovery—similar to federal Rule 26(f)—but this is discretionary with the court.
Interrogatories
Numerical Limits
Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.03(a) permits each party to serve no more than 25 interrogatories on any other party, including subparts. This is a critical distinction: subparts count toward the 25-interrogatory ceiling. For example, an interrogatory asking "Identify all persons who witnessed the incident, their addresses, phone numbers, and statements" would count as one interrogatory but may contain multiple subparts that collectively count toward the limit.
If a party needs more interrogatories, Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.03(a) allows additional interrogatories only by written stipulation of the parties or court order for good cause shown.
Format and Content Requirements
Time to Respond
Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.03(a) requires responses within 30 days after service of the interrogatories. A party may request a 15-day extension by written request before expiration of the initial 30-day period. Further extensions require court order or written stipulation.
Objections
Requests for Production of Documents and Electronically Stored Information
Scope and Format
Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.04(a) governs requests for production of documents (including ESI). A requesting party may serve requests for production without numerical limitation, but requests must be:
Electronically Stored Information (ESI)
Missouri has adapted federal ESI principles through Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.04:
Time to Respond
Responses must be made within 30 days after service. As with interrogatories, parties may request a 15-day extension before expiration.
Format of Production
Requests for Admission
Numerical Limits
Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.05(a) imposes no numerical limit on requests for admission, distinguishing them from interrogatories. This reflects the view that admissions are not as burdensome as other discovery methods.
Time to Respond
Responses must be made within 30 days after service. Failure to respond by the deadline has significant consequences.
Deemed Admissions
This is a critical procedural safeguard in Missouri:
Objections
Depositions
Number of Depositions Allowed
Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.06(a) permits each party to take no more than five (5) depositions of opposing parties, absent written stipulation or court order. This applies to parties; depositions of non-party witnesses are more liberally permitted (see below).
In multi-party litigation, this limit becomes complex: if there are four defendants, each defendant may take up to five party depositions, and the plaintiff may take up to five. However, the rule does not clearly address whether a second deposition of the same party (when permitted under Rule 55.06(d)) counts separately.
Duration
Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.06(a) limits each deposition to one day of seven (7) hours, unless the parties stipulate otherwise or the court orders extended time. Court approval is required to exceed seven hours in a single day.
Notice Requirements
Who Can Be Deposed
Repeat Depositions
Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.06(d) permits a second deposition of a party only by written stipulation or court order and only when there is good cause, such as:
Use at Trial
Depositions may be used at trial:
Videotape Depositions
If a deposition is recorded by videotape, Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.06(c) requires that the audio quality be sufficient for transcription and that the operator be a neutral third party. Video depositions can be powerful at trial if the opposing party is unavailable.
Physical and Mental Examinations
When Allowed
Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.07(a) permits a party to demand a physical or mental examination of an opposing party when the physical or mental condition of the party is in controversy in the action.
Common scenarios include:
Who May Request
Any party may request the examination, though in practice it is most commonly sought by a defendant in a personal injury case.
Requirements
The demanding party must:
Good Cause Standard
Unlike federal practice, which requires a "good cause" showing, Missouri rules require only that the condition be "in controversy." This is a lower threshold: if a plaintiff claims injury and seeks damages, the condition is in controversy. However, a defendant cannot demand an examination for a condition the plaintiff has not claimed.
Protections for the Examined Party
Subpoenas for Non-Parties
Issuance
Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.08(a) requires that subpoenas be issued by the court or signed by the attorney for the party seeking discovery. The subpoena must:
Geographic Limits
Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.08(b) provides that a non-party need not travel more than 100 miles from their residence or place of business to attend a deposition, absent court order.
Compliance and Service
Subpoenas for Records
Expert Discovery
Disclosure Requirements
Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.09(a) requires that a party intending to use an expert at trial must disclose:
Timing
Expert Depositions
Work Product Implications
Expert communications with the attorney are generally work product and not discoverable under Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 56.01. However, once the expert is designated, the opinion itself becomes discoverable.
Rebuttal Experts
If an opposing party discloses an expert, a party may disclose a rebuttal expert at least 30 days before trial or as ordered by the court. A rebuttal expert may rely upon the opinions of the opposing expert without independent investigation.
Scope of Discovery
General Scope
Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.01 defines discoverable material as any matter relevant to the claim or defense in the action. The scope is broad:
Proportionality and Burden
While Missouri's rules do not explicitly state a "proportionality" requirement like federal Rule 26(b)(1), courts may consider:
A party may object to discovery as "unduly burdensome" if the burden substantially outweighs the benefit. Courts weigh these factors in ruling on objections and protective orders.
Privileges and Work Product
Attorney-Client Privilege
Communications between an attorney and client made for the purpose of obtaining legal advice are privileged under Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 56.01(a). This privilege protects:
The privilege does not apply to:
Work Product Doctrine
Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 56.01(b) protects "trial preparation materials" prepared by an attorney in anticipation of litigation:
- Substantial need for the materials
- Inability to obtain equivalent information through other reasonable means
Privilege Log
When a party withholds documents on grounds of privilege, Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.04(c) requires a privilege log listing withheld documents by:
The log must be sufficiently detailed to allow the opposing party to evaluate whether the privilege claim is valid.
Waiver of Privilege
Privilege is waived if:
Inadvertent Production
If a privileged document is inadvertently produced, the producing party must promptly notify the opposing party. Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 56.01(d) provides that the inadvertent production does not constitute waiver if the producing party acted reasonably to prevent disclosure and promptly seeks return of the document. However, the opposing party is not required to return the document or refrain from using it.
Meet and Confer Requirements
Pre-Motion Conference
Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 55.11 requires that before filing a motion to compel discovery or a motion seeking relief from a discovery dispute, the moving party must make a good faith effort to resolve